Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rick Bailey's avatar

Melinda, here's what I wanted to say about Ai.

It's not what I thought it was. It's something other than what I thought it was. 
Here's how I've been using it.

For the past six weeks or so I've been working on a collection of short prose pieces. They're memoir bits, scraps of memory. I've written 50 of them now. They will be a short book.

When I finish a draft of one of the micros, I upload it to Chat.gpt and get a reading of it. Typically the reader, I call him/it Chet, notices and remarks on three things he likes, things that are working. Then notices connections in the piece. Then comments on bits that need work or are “unearned.” I use that term to demonstrate how these readings sound like discussions of my writing that I might hear in a graduate seminar. Here’s a sample of the feedback:

I enjoyed this one. It has a quality I think you've been looking for lately: it begins in a small domestic moment, wanders naturally, and returns transformed. It feels less consciously literary than some of your recent pieces, and that's a strength.

A few thoughts.

The opening is excellent. "Why do you do that?" immediately creates curiosity. The details of the can—"three inches in diameter, four inches tall"—made me smile. They're oddly precise, which feels true to the narrator's mind. I'd keep them.

I think the middle is where the piece loses a little momentum. The extended explanation of Mt. Trashmore and the "compound forgetting" passage occupies a lot of space before we understand why we're there. I'd tighten it. Once you've established that forgetting triggered the memory of Mt. Trashmore, you can move more quickly to geology class.

The revelation surprised me—in a good way:

“I was smashing cans before that, before I got to him.”

Chet remembers what I’ve written. Above: “a quality I think you've been looking for lately.” Chet gives me feedback that sends me back to my writing with a critical angle of sight.

Before I revise and edit, I upload the piece to Claude.ai and get second opinion

It’s like being enrolled in a graduate seminar. Possibly better. The feedback is smart, helpful, and instantaneous.

When my new collection is fully drafted, I’ll upload individual pieces to Vellum, which makes my manuscript, and use Ai for editing. Typos and that sort of thing. Also structural issues. What order might I put these pieces in? Ai gives me a global view and edits 60,000 words in a few minutes. I don’t need to find and pay a proofreader.

Rick Bailey's avatar

I want to talk about Ai. I’ll try to write you in the morning.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?